Officials may have booked Trump hotel but left empty: Politico
The House Oversight Committee is investigating an allegation that at least one foreign government and one trade association booked rooms in US President Donald Trump’s hotels and left them empty, Politico reported.
The committee is probing whether this violates the US Constitution’s Emoluments Clause, which prohibits the president from receiving gifts or cash outside their salary, Politico said.
The probe forms part of the House’s impeachment inquiry into the president.
Many US officials, including Vice President Mike Pence and Attorney General William Barr, have shown preferences to stay at or do business with Trump properties in the past.
Officials from at least one foreign government and one trade association may have booked rooms in US President Donald Trump’s hotels without staying in them in order to curry favor with him, Politico reported.
The allegation is part of the House Oversight Committee’s investigation into whether by taking money from US or foreign government officials at his businesses, Trump broke the law, according to the news site.
The committee’s probe came after it received a tip that the trade association and foreign government, which are separate entities, had booked a large amount of rooms but only used a small number of them, Politico reported, citing an unidentified person familiar with the allegation.
The report did not name the Trump hotels that were allegedly booked.
The House Oversight Committee has not yet responded to Business Insider’s request for details on the allegation and the name of the hotels involved.
The White House and Trump Organization have not yet responded to Business Insider’s request for confirmation and comment on the allegations and House investigation.
The investigation forms part of the House’s larger official impeachment inquiry into the president, Politico reported. The probe, opened by Speaker Nancy Pelosi last week came in light of a revelations that Trump repeatedly pressed Ukraine’s president to investigate his 2020 rival Joe Biden and his son over corruption allegations.
It is unclear whether Trump or his staff had actively asked for or encouraged the hotel reservations, or whether the trade association and foreign officials made the bookings of their own volition.
If Trump or his staff asked for the two entities to make the reservations, then they could have broken the law.
But even if they hadn’t, it would reflect a “culture of corruption that the administration has created,” said Rep. Ro Khanna, a Democratic member of the House Oversight Committee, according to Politico.
“There’s a sense that to curry favor you have to engage in pay to play,” he said. “That’s exactly what the American people hate about Washington.”
Rep. Gerry Connolly, another Democratic member of the committee, also described the bookings as “an obvious attempt to curry favor” with Trump, Politico reported.
“Now we’re looking at near raw bribery,” he added.
Trump has been the subject of multiple investigations into whether he had violated the emoluments cause. He still owns all his businesses, but placed his holdings in a blind trust designed to hold his assets shortly before becoming president.
Here are some recent examples of US officials showing preferences to Trump properties:
During an official trip to Ireland last month Vice President Mike Pence and his staff stayed at the Trump International Golf Links and Hotel in Doonbeg, despite its location on the opposite side of the country from Dublin, where Pence’s meetings were held. Trump had suggested that Pence stay at the resort, Reuters reported at the time, citing a Pence representative.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.