/Outside the Box: VIX clues show how stock investors underpriced the risk of the coronavirus pandemic

Outside the Box: VIX clues show how stock investors underpriced the risk of the coronavirus pandemic

The speed of the fall in the stock market and increase in market volatility over the past month has been stunning. 

From its mid-February highs, the S&P 500

SPX, -1.91%

 is currently down about 25%, while the CBOE Volatility Index

VIX, -1.24%

 , a gauge of volatility in the stock market, spiked to reach an all-time high of 83. In trading on April 2 it finished at about 51.

Did the market underappreciate the risk of a full-blown coronavirus pandemic?

An important clue suggests that the market was indeed a step behind in appreciating the risks that a pandemic posed. The clue comes from the somewhat obscure, but highly traded, VIX futures contract market. The VIX is a widely followed gauge of market volatility, and the VIX futures market is akin to a prediction market for where the VIX will be in the future.

As a starting point, it seems reasonable to wonder whether markets were completely wise to the risks of the coming pandemic before this all started. On February 19, the S&P 500 closed at a record high just 14 points shy of 3400. The VIX closed around 14; a value which was, as with most days over the bull market of the preceding years, well below its historical average of 20.

These events occurred even though the first U.S. case of the COVID-19 coronavirus had been reported in the mainstream news and confirmed by the CDC on January 21. The news out of China had been dire; on February 12, the media reported 14,000 new cases in Hubei Province alone.

By March 2, coronavirus cases were spiking in Europe, and the U.S. had reported possible community spread as well as its first coronavirus-related death. The S&P 500 then had declined to just under 3100. The VIX meanwhile had risen to 33, certainly a large increase from 14.  But did that reflect a full appreciation of the growing risks in the market? 

On March 2, with the VIX at 33, the futures contract expiring March 18 settled at a futures price of 26, suggesting that markets expected the VIX to fall 7 points over 16 days. The VIX tends to move predictably towards its long-term average — let’s call that 20 — so even though things turned out worse later, the forecast of 26 at the time did not seem unreasonable. 

But because the VIX tends move toward its average, we should ask: On March 2, with the VIX at 33, where would a statistical model put the VIX as of March 18? Using well-known techniques I discussed in a 2019 article published in the Review of Financial Studies, a statistical model estimated using the history of the VIX would have produced a forecast just exceeding 30.

Both forecasts turned out to be far wide of the mark: things got worse fast. The VIX spiked to around 70 by March 18. Because the futures price was below the statistically fair forecast, investors had expected more volatility to subside than the fair forecast. 

The key observation is that the futures price fell below the fair forecast. Usually it’s the other way around: the futures price typically exceeds the fair forecast of the VIX. The reason is that a trader who buys a VIX futures contract hedges higher uncertainty and thus pays a higher-than-fair price. Instead, with prices below the fair forecast, investors in the VIX futures market were a step behind the forecast in assessing how bad things would get.

Read: The stock market might not bottom until the VIX comes down — here’s why the volatility gauge remains stubbornly high

Investors weren’t just lagging the fair forecast on March 2, either. As the graph below shows, starting on February 24, futures prices fell below contemporaneous statistical forecasts of the VIX for over two weeks. Crucially, there is a tendency for futures prices to shoot up following such days. This suggests that investors were over-optimistic about how much volatility would subside.

This type of pattern isn’t just due to chance or a bad statistical model but rather under-appreciation of growing risks in the market.  In the Review of Financial Studies article, I document that, throughout the history of the VIX futures market, futures prices tend to fall below statistically fair forecasts as market risks grow, but that there is nevertheless a tendency for futures prices to subsequently move toward the fair forecasts. Most prominently, VIX futures prices fell below the fair forecasts on the eve of episodes spanning a rogue’s gallery of major market turmoil such as the 2008 financial crisis. Even in these episodes, futures prices subsequently adjusted upward as investors caught on to impending risks.

Investors in the VIX futures market were slow to appreciate the growing risks to the market as the coronavirus pandemic spread. That period of under-appreciation seems to have passed: VIX futures prices now exceed the statistical forecasts. Just weeks ago, the market didn’t think uncertainty would last that long, but now there are signs the market expects it to be with us for a while.

Ing-Haw Cheng is an associate professor of business administration at Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College. This commentary is not investment advice.

Read: Your next move will play a big role in beating the market over the long term

More: He nailed the March coronavirus selloff — now he says there’s another 30% to go before the stock market hits bottom


Original Source